Interactive Cases of Bioethics and Public Health: By the Examples of Counteraction to Xenophobia, Discrimination and Inequality

Aim: This article examines how bioethicists can make a significant contribution to mediation, public discourse, research, educating, learning, policy-making and academic impact in response troubling persistent models of xenophobia, racism ‘pretentious’ prejudice. In order meaningful these issues, need training, awareness that they play an important educational role cooperation with other specialists social spheres. Materials Methods: An understanding issues from the perspective bioethics is terms methodological approach used its explanations. For example, education, health, etc. course research bibliographic, bibliosemantic method, method system analysis. Conclusions: The main mechanism for combating xenophobia development personal tolerance. Tolerance does not require obligatory love «our own»’ «others», but offers recognition real pluralism cultures ways life, Professional training of/for as partners/trainers who work together community create solutions. Thus, bioethicists, we new cultural programmes based on knowledge gained through integration previous projects various layers society. They stimulate ethical creative thinking, conditions team learning encourage people teams find innovative operating contexts high uncertainty complexity 21st century. We therefore assume agents change, are able operate levels (starting primary level), contributing increasing tolerance one country’s population by communicating key bioethical messages. purpose tutors will be only understand psychological sources discrimination manifestations, also corroborate existing negative attitudes stereotypes prevalent modern